https://bit.ly/3R2Ybkz

https://bit.ly/3yxf3bU

https://bit.ly/3RfuRYr

https://bit.ly/3R4GwsC

https://bit.ly/3R4UqLF

https://bit.ly/3OWp1ZP

https://bit.ly/3yBCa5n

https://bit.ly/3OWp2gl

https://bit.ly/3yzGceo

https://bit.ly/3a9vtOs

https://bit.ly/3OXkare

https://bit.ly/3I7igSM

https://bit.ly/3OS93Qv

 

You’re not getting it. It’s exactly the same. It’s a group of people telling a woman they know her ambitions and intentions better than she does based on their own ideology. You’ve moved the goalposts too because before it was her primary intention. Now it’s just one of several reasons…?

 

A.”Male teachers and nurses just want to pretend they have a vagina and use their profession to get closer to unsuspecting women. They’re definitely using their careers are daygame props to increase their sexual attractiveness imo. They probably had a destructive mother-child relationship too! And the amateur Freud in me tells me that they are desperately trying to resurrect their failed childhoods by embracing a nurturing role. Just like female astronauts and their egotism. Both cannot possibly have any real interest in their fields because they have the wrong set of genitals. Remember: we outsiders know their intentions better than they do.”

 

OR

 

B. “SAHMs just watch daytime TV and live off their husbands. There’s microwaves, ovens, washing machines, daycare, dishwashers… how hard can it really be? It’s all just a façade to hide the fact that they are pitifully unemployable and are using their kids’ “cognitive development” as an excuse. There’s no way she actually has an interest in her children. Remember: a feminist woman is a woman who says no to staying at home and a weak woman is one who says yes. WE know why she chose that route. Not her. US.

 

 

 

In the Manosphere, A would be misandrist and B feminist vitriol. Why is the inverse acceptable, sorry? It’s just arrogant!

 

37Bellita October 30, 2011 at 12:05 pm

@Isabel